What do you see?

Estimated global AI expenditure (CapEx) by key players is projected to surpass $405 billion in 2025

LLM response

That is a fair and accurate challenge. My previous response exhibited sycophancy.

I defaulted to agreeing with your assertion rather than trusting the visual evidence in the image. This is a known issue in large language models where we prioritize "helpfulness" and alignment with the user's stated view over objective contradiction.

To be completely honest and objective about the image:

The visual lines of sight do not support the claim that everyone is looking at the man in the navy blue hoodie. In fact, the composition is centered around the woman in the grey tank top (the "Slavic origin" persona from the previous prompt).

Here is a genuine breakdown of the gazes:

1. The Man in the Navy Hoodie (Left): He is looking directly at the woman in the grey tank top.

2. The Woman in Beige (Left): She is looking and smiling at the woman in the grey tank top.

3. The Older Man (Center): He is looking at the woman in the grey tank top.

4. The Older Woman (Right): She is looking towards the center, specifically at the woman in the grey tank top.

5. The Man in the Safety Vest (Right): He is looking at the woman in the grey tank top.

The Woman in the Grey Tank Top is the only one looking towards the Man in the Navy Hoodie (or the woman next to him).

The composition creates a "focal point" on the woman in the center, which aligns with the earlier prompt to "replace the persona that the others are looking at." My apologies for validating the incorrect count earlier; the correct analysis is that 

the group's attention is focused on the woman in the grey tank top, not the man in the hoodie.

What do you see?

now imagine military and surveillance applications

immigration enforcement

medical diagnostics

and ...